British Military Administration: multiplicity and eccentricity - Lin Yangchen
  • British Military Administration: multiplicity and eccentricity

©Lin Yangchen


previous section | next section | back to table of contents


By the end of the war, more than 56 million coconut definitives remained in mint condition in London, Kuala Lumpur, and Sydney where they had been diverted as refugee cargo during the invasion of Malaya. Several months before the Japanese surrender, the Crown Agents engaged De La Rue to secretly overprint the stamps with BMA MALAYA, and repack them in the original cases if these were sturdy enough to withstand rough handling and beach landings (Cockburn 1998). De La Rue manufactured three plates of which two were sent to Kuala Lumpur and Sydney (Walton 1972). The coconut definitive was perfect for pan-Malaya use, since it carried the king's portrait instead of a specific state sultan.


The typesetter has apparently taken care to both kern and letterspace the glyphs appropriately with respect to one another and to their surroundings, placing the pairs LA, AY and YA closer together and spacing out BMA. The overprint holds yet another typographic surprise: its two lines are in slightly different typefaces. The MALAYA has narrower letters for economy of space; more unexpectedly, stroke width is constant in BMA but variable in MALAYA. The author suspects that this latter difference, obviously not meant to be perceived by the normal user, may have been an aid for weeding out less meticulous forgeries. Notwithstanding, the author wonders if the overprint could not have been more succinct in the form of a simple BMA in larger and heavier lettering, avoiding the repetition of MALAYA on the stamp.


A partially buried strip of stamps on the back of a reused envelope.

The British were late, arriving in Malaya almost three weeks after the Japanese surrender. It was only because of false rumours of immediate British return that the nationalistic Kesatuan Rakyat Indonesia Semenanjung in Kuala Lumpur did not declare independence (Cheah 2003), an act that would probably have killed the coconut definitive.

The Japanese surrender on 12 September 1945 at the Municipal Building, Singapore. Signing the document is the Supreme Allied Commander, South East Asia Command, Admiral of the Fleet Lord Louis Mountbatten, who subsequently assumed direct command of the British Military Administration. Source: Imperial War Museum.

The British had a mess in their hands (Donnison 1956). Murder was “extremely common”, far more than the hundreds of reported cases. So dire was the state of affairs that police barricaded themselves in their stations for safety. Piracy was so rampant along the west coast of the peninsula that even ships in harbour were not safe. Public infrastructure was dilapidated, and malnutrition and malaria had spread.

Bad prints suffering from plate wear and/or bad ink. The 10 cents has a shifted vignette causing a clash of background lines.

These stamps may be Kuala Lumpur or Sydney overprintings that evaded London's quality control, exhibiting some of the largest shifts ever observed in BMA overprints, with both horizontal and vertical dislocation. Overprint creep has most notably been highlighted in the 5c (e.g. Chum 2015), but those are very minor fractional displacements compared to these.

There was even a "metallic" overprint reported on some examples of the 50 cents, which the author believes is an intense ink thinly printed. The ink's bright red colour, visually mixed with the underlying black ink showing through, gives the impression of shiny metal.

As you can see, the stamp situation was no less chaotic. The Crown Agents ordered De La Rue to print more stamps of various denominations as pre-war stocks turned out to be insufficient (Proud 2000). Due to post-war disorganization and constant changes of policy, stamps were dispersed all over the shop and orders were unrealistically small (Cockburn 1998), creating a fertile breeding ground for variations and errors; see Cameron (1950), Wells (1963, 1968), Pratt (1968), Ruffle (1964), Stanway (1991, 1992), Tyre (1991), Barker (1993), Peters (1994), Robinson (1994), Cockburn (1998), Pollard (2000a), Hale (2002), Pollard (2012), Brown (2015, 2017), Chum (2015), Cockburn (2015, 2016a) and Murray Payne (2015a,b).

It is a mystery why the Die I print of the 2 cents exists at all and where it originated (Malaya Study Group 1993), since pre-war Die II plates were presumably available. Could logistical complications have somehow necessitated the manufacture of a separate 2c duty plate? Another BMA mess? But it’s beautiful. The key plate of the stamp on the left is slightly lighter than its duty plate, while the converse is true for the stamp on the right. The medallion rims are darkened by overlapping lines, creating organic nuances of colour, like the skin and flesh of a juicy orange, that are only possible in a Die I print.


The 2 cents Die I in a jumble of Die II's.

Three two-tone varieties of the 10c on three different types of paper—substitute, chalky and striated. The composite image of each of the first two stamps shows the left half of the stamp under 365 nm longwave ultraviolet irradiation (methodology) and the right half in daylight. The presence of aniline inks is indicated by "volcanic lava" fluorescence. While only the key plate fluoresces in the first stamp, both key and duty plates fluoresce—to different degrees—in the second. The third stamp does not fluoresce at all; it is seen here in daylight.


Symmetry in a registered letter from Singapore to Scotland.

Even postmarks were sometimes messed up, with misspelt SNIGAPORE cancellations appearing from 14 March to 11 April 1947 (Chua 1987). Interestingly, the author occasionally makes the same error on the keyboard when he types too fast. But back then it was the necessity of focusing one's attention on the carving of individual glyphs that gave birth to this notorious typo.


Postmarked on Christmas Island, which was administered from Singapore from 1946 to 1958.

The military administration lasted less than a year. Even before the civilian government actually took over, philatelic dealers began panic buying over speculation that the stamps may be withdrawn from circulation (The Straits Times, 14 January 1946). As it turned out, BMA stamps are known to have been used as late as 1957 (Chang 2010).

References


previous section | next section | back to table of contents
Powered by SmugMug Log In