Forged Japanese occupation handstamps

TV broadcast from the 28th floor of the Kuala Lumpur Hilton.

Forged Japanese occupation overprints are abundant and have been extensively documented, but the implements that produced them have never been reported. On the 25th of April I received a message from a new acquaintance. He was looking for information on a bunch of strange chops that his late father had left behind. It turned out to be a Varied set including seals, machine chops, bma and even postmarks. Multiples of some overprints incuding five of the Okugawa, which has three genuine forms. How old they are, who made them, who used them and quantities produced remain unconfirmed.

Forged handstamps shown to the author, somewhere in the outskirts of Kuala Lumpur.
sheet metal nailed to blocks of common furniture softwood that function as grips All cut from the same strip of wood, exactly same height Cheap and easily available raw materials Actually a Common way of making handstamps of seals and wording at the time.

Annotated Catalogue
Circular date stamps and non-coconut overprints are included in the group photograph above but not listed here.

Single frame 1 dimensions caked with black residue apparently from faking the relatively rare black variety of the chop.

The author examined several stamps (not shown) bearing impressions made by this chop, all with black ink. It is a forgery of Proud type 5 (Gallatly type E). The outside edge of the frame is too straight, the frame is too thin, and its corners are too rounded especially at upper left. The characters are suspiciously clean. See two other forgeries of type E.

Okugawa 1, 2 dimensions imitates the relatively elongate second form of the chop in overall look and feel, but the details do not conform.

Okugawa 3, 4, 5 dimensions imitates third form of the chop in overall look and feel, but the details do not conform. The details of the characters differ across the handstamps, which indicates that the handstamps were not produced from a single template. There is of course no point making multiple copies of exactly the same seal, since one piece should suffice. The intention may have been to introduce variability, which would make it more difficult to tell the forged overprints from real ones, and dilute suspicion.

Uchibori 1 dimensions

Penang seals used soft ink pad: whole surface smeared

Dai Nippon Penang 1 dimensions sloppy lettering, blunt corners

Dai Nippon Malaya 1, 2 dimensions sloppy lettering, blunt corners. Font weight differs between the two, indicating that some trial and error was going on.

Selangor Exhibition 1 dimensions sloppy lettering, blunt corners

Kanji 1 dimensions The serifs are indistinct and the strokes melt into one another. Good effort but can't fool the sharp eye.

In contrast to the forged seals, the forged machine chops look as if they’d seen very little use. Perhaps the forger had them made and then realised that they were not up to the job of replicating the precise lettering.

BMA 1, 2 dimensions See BMA overprint forgeries for details.

How were these made? The alloy used for type tends to be Type metal, an alloy of lead, tin and antimony, but here Some look like aluminium and some zinc with a slight greenish tinge: common materials used in die casting Printing surface seems to have an additional plating of another metal or alloy to reduce wear Worn off in some places

Vertical definition of the printing surface. The typography may be sloppy, but the topography is incisive.

Acknowledgements
I am grateful to the individual who tipped me off about these artifacts. His identity is kept confidential to protect his privacy.

References

previous: machine chops | next: Trengganu overprint | back to table of contents